Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan | Louisville, Kentucky

Call For An Appointment: 502-934-7090

  • Home
  • About
    • Kenneth A. Bohnert
    • Ted Lasley
    • Bradley R. Palmer
    • Edward F. Busch
    • Chris F. Gorman
    • Scott A. Johnson
    • Richard M. Sullivan
    • Maureen P. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Securities Litigation
    • Business And Commercial Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Personal Injury
    • Government And Municipal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact
Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan | Louisville, Kentucky
  • Home
  • About
    • Kenneth A. Bohnert
    • Ted Lasley
    • Bradley R. Palmer
    • Edward F. Busch
    • Chris F. Gorman
    • Scott A. Johnson
    • Richard M. Sullivan
    • Maureen P. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Securities Litigation
    • Business And Commercial Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Personal Injury
    • Government And Municipal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Ready To Partner With You To Find A Legal Solution

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. 2026
  4.  » 
  5. March

Month: March 2026

How to prove investment fraud after losing money

On Behalf of Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan, PLLC | Mar 27, 2026 | Securities Litigation

A sharp loss can cause more than financial damage. It may also lead to confusion and a need for clear answers. In some situations, the loss may point to investment fraud rather than market risk. Investment fraud involves deceptive conduct tied to an investment, such...

What evidence is used to prove defective construction work?

On Behalf of Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan, PLLC | Mar 17, 2026 | Construction Litigation

Construction disputes can arise even when you run a careful and successful company. A former client may claim that your work caused damage or failed to meet expectations. In Kentucky construction litigation, claims typically require evidence beyond a party’s...

How do you deal with Kentucky adjusters?

On Behalf of Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan, PLLC | Mar 10, 2026 | Personal Injury

Insurance adjusters call quickly after a Louisville, Kentucky, crash or injury, long before you know the full extent of your injuries. The adjuster may sound friendly, yet their ultimate goal is often to limit what the company pays you. How you handle that first call...

2 signs of a fraudulent transfer in Kentucky business cases

On Behalf of Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan, PLLC | Mar 4, 2026 | Business & Commercial Litigation

You extend credit to a business. Later, you notice that major assets have moved out of the company. Equipment, property or receivables no longer appear on recent records. The balance sheet shows fewer resources available to address outstanding debt. In some...

Recent Posts

  • Was the broker working or just helping themselves?
  • What is a patent construction defect?
  • 3 examples of a contract breach
  • Does Kentucky have a timeline to claim personal injury?
  • Seeking personal injury compensation in Kentucky?

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025

Categories

  • Business & Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Litigation
  • Firm News
  • Personal Injury
  • Securities Litigation

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

How Can Our Team Help You?

Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan | Louisville, Kentucky

Address

325 West Main Street
Suite 250
Louisville, KY 40202
Louisville Office
Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan | Louisville, Kentucky

Contact

Phone: 502-934-7090

Review Us

© 2026 Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan, PLLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

*AV, AV Preeminent, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale- Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer-review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.